Monday, June 29, 2009

"Getting a Grasp on the concept of Dieting" by Corey Springer

Getting a Grasp on the concept of Dieting
By Corey Springer
AKA "Narkissos"
Owner of: Apollo Fitness Barbados & "The NarkSide" Fitness Forums.
re-written: Monday June 15 2009 for Kurama Magazine

Summer's Here!
Time to worship the sun!
Time to strip down to the bare essentials: flaunting that tight midsection, those sharply detailed arms, thighs and buns.
...Physical perfection!!!

Well... technically that's what's supposed to happen.

However if you're the average person working a nine-to-five, summer just seems to sneak up on you doesn't it?

I understand.
Honestly I do.

You try to keep in the gym year round. You do your crunches, and you eat 'healthily': ‘Healthy’, a concept which changes by the day.

We’ve all heard:
"Fats are Bad"

"Carbs are Bad"

"Carbs are Good"

"Fats are good"

"Sugar is a no-no"

"Fructose is big ole YES!"

"Too much protein causes kidney failure!"
There’s so much information out there, and so much of it (re: carbs being labelled *both* bad *and* good) is contradictory. So who do you listen to?!

We've all felt that confusion: If everything's 'bad', then what do we eat?

I'm here to tell you that you are not alone in your confusion.

I am here to tell you that confusion is a mass-marketing ploy to sell more products.

Thus, infomercial’s sole purpose isn’t 'information' (as the prefix 'inform' would suggest), but confusion via information overload... and subsequently, the sale of whatever new product their marketing geniuses come up with

/ends rant reluctantly.

This article is a compilation of facts. Its purpose is to educate: to highlight some of the 'basics' so to speak. At the end of it, you should have a sounder grasp of on the concept of dieting.

Part 2: “What do I take?!?!?”

This is usually the first question I receive.

Not: "How should I eat?", or "How should I train?"

But: "What do I take?"

I attribute this question to years and years of brainwashing by supplement sales men.
I believe that the consumer is at this point less than confident with their ability to achieve the results they want without some form of psychological crutch.

This is not a direct lash at you the consumer...

This is just a statement of acknowledgement.

For over a decade supplement producers have attempted to lull us into the belief that supplement 'A' would serve as a magic pill: fat-loss in a bottle.

A decade, and a couple thousand dollars, later we're still dissatisfied... but none the wiser.

Here're my thoughts: Use your supplements if you will... but use them wisely.

Supplements have legitimate application:
·Convenience: Supplements are convenient. Meal replacements for example are good on the go. The essential minerals and vitamins can be supplied in a standardized manner, making the reaching of pre-set daily requirements easier.

·Concentration Boost: Supplements, thermogenics specifically, can give that much needed boost both inside and outside the gym. This is especially pertinent to those of you who are employed a sector which requires high levels of concentration. These individuals tend be mentally drained by the time they reach the gym. This boost in concentration can benefit low-carb dieters specifically, as a reduction in carbs consumed tends to leave some a bit disoriented.
·Energy Boost: No one can discount the noticeable kick in the rear-end that some supplements can supply!

This being said though, supplements can only provide building blocks.

Benefits are derived from your hard work.


Part 3: My thoughts on cutting calories...


My thoughts are: A distinction needs to be made between 'cutting' calories (i.e. caloric restriction), and starvation.

Making this distinction seems to be especially hard.

This is compounded by an inability to comprehend that weight-loss is fuelled by activity... which is in turn fuelled by food.

The latter is note-worthy, as it denotes that starvation is actually counterproductive.



Part 4: Fat-loss equation: Calories in

The above equation is at the root of the fitness industry.

Whenever you ask a supposed fitness professional, this is the generic answer which you'll receive.

It is true to some effect... but it is easily abused.

...Especially by those new to dieting.

'More is better': this is the general thought process that pervades the modern world.

However, such thinking is counterproductive here...

This holds special significance with regard to the abovementioned caloric deficit.

Simply put, too large of a caloric deficit puts you in starvation mode.

I suppose similar can be said by too high of a caloric output... as too much cardio can be almost as 'damaging'... comparatively speaking.

This isn't to say that one should scrimp on cardio... but rather that one shouldn't overdo it.

Neither should one think that doing cardio will fix a junk-food filled diet.

...Because it won't.

Ok...so where does this leave you?

A number of different schemes come to mind.

Each centers around calculating your approximate Basal Metabolic rate.

A guide to calculating such can be found here.

After calculating your required calorie intake and formulating your diet (which should supply adequate protein; carbohydrates; and fats)... the next step would be to add activity.

A caloric deficit can be achieved by:

a. cutting calories

or

b. adding activity... without changing your calorie intake.

I prefer the latter.

Cardio should be performed 3-6 times per week, with each session lasting between 30 and 45 minutes.

Cardio timing will depend on your however.

Some claim that cardio first thing in the morning on an empty stomach is optimal.

I've tried various times, and my opinion is this: cardio performed at ANY time is better than not doing cardio at all.

Personally I do 30-45 minutes of cardio directly after completing my weight-training workout.

This brings me to another topic...Low energy levels generally reduce potential energy output... as we are able to complete perceivably less and less activity.

Cutting food intake too low, and maintaining an inadequate food intake for too long, slows the metabolism.
A slowed metabolism, coupled with post-starvation binge-eating (which so often occurs) results in rebound fat gain... Additional fat is gained as the metabolic rate is now slower than it was before.

Thus, starvation is basically equivalent to shooting oneself in the foot... and the knee... and the elbow.. and the hip... and the head lol.

The correct way is to 'feed the fire': i.e. split your allotted, and appropriate, calorie intake over the course of the day... consuming relatively moderate-calorie meals every 2-3 hours.

Jumpstart that metabolism... Get to eating!

This brings me to another thought...


Part 5: Weight-train!!!


What... A no-brainer?

I'd argue otherwise.

A number of people seem opposed to it.

"Oh... it's boring"

Or: "I don't wanna get too huge"

Or the consummate female trainee: "I don't wanna look-a like-a man"

My replies?

*pseudo-slap upside the head*

It's boring... so is going to work, yet you go there 8 hours out of each day because you deem it necessary to your existence.

How is your health any less important?

"I don't wanna get too huge"... Poor excuse.

'Getting huge' requires years of dedication.

'Getting huge' requires years of doing everything right ('everything' being diet; training; etc.)

'Getting huge' is something that most people have nothing to worry about.

The above applies to the female trainee who has had society drill into her head that weight-lifting is equated to the development of masculinity.

This simply is not the case.

It is difficult for women to put on a lot of muscle

Further, the small amount of muscle you can plausibly gain will go a long way in increasing your metabolic rate... thus, keeping you leaner even at rest.

Add this to the fact that muscle is that which gives women curves... not fat.

Sure fat blankets curves... making structures more aesthetically pleasing...

...but these structures are composed of muscle.

So want a curvier butt?

Weight-training is your answer!!!



Part 6: Stop punishing yourself!


I think we as humans are gluttons for punishment.

Further, we seem to enjoy punishment at our own hands.

Often I hear the terms 'good' and 'bad' used by my clients:

"Today I was good".. "Today I was bad".

To me these terms just enforce a cycle of self-hate and self-punishment.

...And neither has a place in anyone's fitness vocabulary.

...Not with regard to diet that is.

When you foul up MOVE ON!

Learn from the experience: the triggers to your indulgence.

But don't punish yourself.

In the same vein, don't use a temporary weakness as an excuse for cheating regularly.

If starvation is akin to shooting oneself in the foot, cheating regularly is akin to shooting oneself in the head.

This brings me to the whole concept of:



Part 7: 'Cheat Days'.

I honestly don't believe in such.

I do realize that this may come as a shock to you... as so many fitness professionals support such.

But then again, i hold very little stock in the opinions of fitness professionals.

The fact of the matter is many of them thrive on repeat business.

By 'repeat' i mean continual.

i.e. They are minimalists: giving you moderately effective advice, as opposed to optimum advice... and you get the bare minimum (with regard to results) by extension.

Cheat days inforce the consumption of junk food.

Very seldom does an individual indulge in one cupcake.

One begets two... two begets a box.

My advice?

Add an extra helping of vegetables if you're feeling hungry.

If you have a legitimate craving (as some women may have during their periods)... and it's tearing at your mind... have that piece of chocolate.

Just don't get into a structured cycle of cheating.

Because the habit is hard to break once established.

Trust me on this.

What about sugar-free stuff you say?

Or 'light' stuff?

Sugar-free does not denote calorie-free.

Light does not mean sugar free.

Indulge sparingly... because at the end of the day the calories add up.

And finally:



Part 8: Take it one day at a time!

We live in a global culture of instant gratification.

Our bodies however have not evolved to respond in this manner.

..Thankfully that is.

In the same manner that one cannot get fat overnight... One cannot expect to get in shape overnight.

Embark on this journey with that in mind.

Take it one day at a time.

Learn from your body.

Revel in your new found strength(s).

Pat yourself on the back where deserved.

Forgive yourself where you foul up.

Good luck!

Regards,

-Corey Springer
AKA "Narkissos"
Owner of:
Apollo Fitness Barbados & "The NarkSide" Fitness Forums.

Monday, June 15, 2009

"I can't drink water" By Corey Springer

"I can't drink water"
By Corey Springer AKA "Narkissos"

Saturday, June 13th 2009: The NarkSide

Hi all.

I guess by now you guys expect a rant from me each and every time I pick up the trusty old pen.

Today's article will be a bit different however. No sarcasm from me... No berating.

Just information.

So let's get to it!


Fluid needs


Water... How much do we need?

This is a heavily debated area in the field of fitness. Some professionals spout the "eight (8) glasses per day mantra"... others claim that we get enough fluid from whole foods to be fully hydrated[1].

Some claim that the heavy consumption of caffeinated beverages, as is the societal norm, leads to dehydration. However, Grandjean et. al. (2003) argued that there was no difference in levels of hydration (measured via hematologic or urinary indices) when the non-consumption of caffeine was compared to caffeine consumed at moderate levels[1]. Appreciably, it can be argued that 1.4 mg (per kg of bodyweight) to 3.13 mg (per kg of bodyweight), as was the range investigated in this study, bears no relation to 'normal' caffeine consumption... as individuals characteristically consume much higher amounts per sitting.


Putting it into perspective:

Coffee drinkers in the USA consume an average of 2.6 cups of coffee per day [2][3]. This translates into an average of 363.5 mg of coffee per day [2][3]. Personally, my coffee intake is MUCH higher.

Grandjean et. al. (2003) also surmised that hydration levels, again measured via hematologic or urinary indices, remained unchanged by comparsion... regardless of whether plain water composed 100%, 50%, or even just 25% of total fluid intake per day.

Let's not join this debate however. I'm pretty sure that long after we're all gone, they'll be *still* debating.


Let's approach this topic from another perspective:
staying lean.


As discussed in my previous article ("Cut liquid calories...cut the fat.) dieters tend not to factor in the significant

impact that liquid calories have on weight-gain. Studies have shown a 300% increase [4] in the consumption of sugar-laden beverages. 300%!! This increase has been tied to equally concerning shifts...namely: an increase in insulin resistance (and related afflictions), and an increase in obesity. Children and adults alike walk past the water cooler, and opt to pop a soft drink instead.

Why?


"I can't drink water...it has no taste."


Ok... you're right. Water has no taste.

I won't sit here and preach to you about the health benefits. Heck, I won't argue hydration.

I'm going to go out on a limb here with this one and state: If you don't like it, don't drink it!

"WHAT?!"

"Has Nark gone MAD?!"

Breathe people... Breathe.

Let me expand on my previous statement.

If you don't like it... don't drink it (plain).



Enter Lemonade and its brethren!


A friend came to me just yesterday with a horror story. She'd had a terrible sugar crash that very day, which had left her nauseous, shaking, and scared as hell.

As a sugar-junky, she really couldn't seem to find the willpower to switch to a non-sweetened beverage. So, she needed an option.

I suggested lemonade.


She listened to the solution with raised eyebrows.


At the end she asked: "So... you'd like me to swap one sweetened drink for another?"

I smiled and relayed the recipe: Lime juice, water, and stevia.



The explanation?

1-2 tbsp lemon juice + 2-4 packets stevia + ice + water = a diet beverage with a twist.


The pros?

  • No artificial sweeteners (this is a concern with diet drinks)
  • Less than 1 gram of sugar per serving (ergo no influence on blood sugar levels)
  • Lemonade is thirst-quenching.
  • It's tasty as hell! ("Water tastes bad"? Now you have no excuse!)


The cons?

  • You no longer have anything to bitch about.


Take home message:

There're LOADS of natural beverages that you can make: Mauby, Sorrel... the list is extensive!

If you "can't drink water"... then don't drink it (plain)!

Kill two birds with one stone people!

Health, quite literally, never tasted this good. :)


Regards,

-Corey Springer
AKA "Narkissos"
Owner of: Apollo Fitness Barbados & "The NarkSide" Fitness Forums.




References:


1. Grandjean et. al., The Effect on Hydration of Two Diets, One with and One without Plain Water. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 22, No. 2, 165-173, 2003.
2. Schreiber et al., Measurement of coffee and caffeine intake: Implications for epidemiolgic research, Preventive Medicine, 17:280-294, 1988
3. Chou, T., Wake up and smell the coffee. Caffeine, coffee and the medical consequences, West. J. Med., 157:544-553, 1992
4. Harrington. The Role of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in Adolescent Obesity: A Review of the Literature. Journal of School Nursing, v24 n1 p3-12 2008

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Can't lose the fat? 3 things 75% of you are doing wrong!

Can't lose the fat? 3 things 75% of you are doing wrong!

By Corey Springer AKA "Narkissos"

Monday, June 8th 2009: The NarkSide


Hey all... It's just after midnight and, instead of sleeping, I've just spent the last couple of hours

listening to a friend lament about how he was finding it impossible to lose weight. He pointed fingers in every direction, 'cept at himself.

"Man, I'm kinda eating close to plan. I'm almost working out daily. I try not to snack... Man. I DON'T KNOW WHY I CAN'T LOSE THE WEIGHT!"

"Kinda"?
"Almost"?
"Try not to"?

His three sentences told me more about his eating and work-outs habits, than an hour of dialogue did.

It told me that he half-assed it.

Most people do.

Most people approach fat-loss as a system of balances: Take a little from here, add it there and voila!

...a six-pack.

If it worked like that however, each and every one of you reading this would have a six-pack...whether you wanted one or not.

Let's get down to the nitty-gritty.

I'll call this rant "Half-assing 101": The GetNarked edition.


Half-assed act #1: Being a boozer.

What's wrong with a little alcohol? Not much... 'a little' being the operative term. Research shows that those who consume a single alcoholic beverage once per week are less likely to become absolute lard-asses. On the opposite end of the spectrum, those who drink socially (i.e. 4-6 + drinks) increase the risk of becoming obese by 50%.

Compounding this would be the practice of adding high-sugar beverages (commonly called chasers/mixers) to alcoholic beverages. These beverages can contain caffeine (which impairs glucose

uptake when consumed alongside carbohydrates), as well as high fructose corn syrup (which, in itself, is more fattening/damaging than sugar alone).

The combined effect?

Fat-ass... in a cup!

Referencing 'a little' once more:

Raise your hands if you think you're "doing enough". i.e.

Raise your hands if you think that you should be seeing more results (with regard to weight-loss) that you are currently seeing.

*pauses*

Now...raise your hands if you can honestly say that you consume only one drink per week.

I'd fathom that there are no raised hands at this point.



Half-assed act #2: Thinking that doing "extra exercise" can offset the deliterious effects of your binges.

...as it really doesn't.

I've lost track of the number of times I've walked into a gym, trained a client, trained myself, done my cardio, and walked out...leaving the same chick plowing away on the elliptical.

Her rationale?

Well... either she binged for 3 days and now is trying to 'work it off'... or she anticipates binging, and is trying to create a deficit prior to doing so.

How silly is that?

No... Seriously.

HOW. Silly. IS. that?

Let's put this in perspective: A 'normal' person consumes anywhere between 1500 and 3000 calories per day.

A binge-eater may consume 10,000-20,000 calories per sitting... Note that I said: PER SITTING!

So... 3 binges per day, for 3 days (as per the typical weekend binge)... comes up to.

...well, you can do the math.

Granted... the body can't assimilate all of those calories in one sitting. However, you can be sure as hell that it WILL try!

That being said, I can't fathom how any logical-thinking individual could possibly believe that hopping on the treadmill for 90 minutes the following day could 'counteract' the damage they did during the binge.

As we tend to burn an average of ten calories per minute during intense exercise, it would take 16 hours of cardio to 'counteract' a single binge-meal.

Let me reiterate: one (1) stuff-my-face-til-it-hurts session = 16 hours of cardio.

*pause*

Raise your hand if you've tried to 'burn off' a previous day's indiscretion.





Half-assed act #3: Dealing with one bad habit at a time...

...as opposed to addressing all of your issues at once.

Nark: "Why haven't you cut out the junk food?"
Fatty: "Man, stop giving me a hard time... at least I've started to drink more water."

Nark: "Why aren't you doing your cardio mate?"
Fatty: "Hell man, isn't enough that I'm lifting weights a couple times per week? That's a step!"


I call this this the 'mediocrity celebration' act.

We're taught at school that taking things one step at a time leads to ultimate success.

In the corporate world however, it is the multitaskers who are most successful.

Fitness follows similar ground rules: If you attempt to cover all your bases, but fail at one of two over the course of time, you're going to be WAY more successful than someone who addresses one of two issues, but fails anyway.

Research published in the Archives of Internal Medicine supports this exact position. In a study of over 200 people who smoked, didn't exercise much, and ate high-sodium junk food (thus leading to hypertension), one group was asked to quit smoking, cut back on dietary sodium, and to add exercise... all at once.

Another group addressed bad habits... one at a time.

At the end of 18 months, the group where individuals tackled all of their problems simultaneously had the higher success rate.

No kidding 'eh?


Ok... let's recap:

Show, via the raising of hands, how many of you drink.

Show, via the raising of hands, how many of you use exercise as a band-aid to cover your dietary boo-boos.

And lastly: Show, via the raising of hands, how many of you approach the resolution of your fattening habits in a mediocre fashion.


By now, nearly all of you should have your hands in the air.

However, I need you to do one more thing, so we can render this exercise complete.


Here it is... our magic solution:

Step 1: Bring that palm down to face level.

Step 2: Examine it.

Step 3: Now... Slap yourself.

Step 4: Review each of the 3 steps outlined in this article.

Step 5: Repeat steps 1-4 three times.




Good luck all!

Regards,

-Corey Springer
Owner of The NarkSide
Owner of Apollo Fitness Barbados

Monday, June 8, 2009

Busting Weight-loss Myths the NarkSide way.

Busting Weight-loss Myths the NarkSide way.
By Corey Springer AKA "Narkissos"

Monday, June 8th 2009: The NarkSide


Hi all. Another beautiful Monday is about to come to an end.

Do you know what it is?

Of course you do: RANT TIME!

I've been receiving more and more spam of late, from well-meaning individuals.

Well, at least it starts out as 'well-meaning' until I point out the blatant lack of intelligent content to

these articles which happen to grace my email inbox.

Personally, I'm tired of these copy and paste queens... so today's article serves to take a crack at

the crap they've been passing off under the guise of offering 'fitness advice'.

Let's investigate the my top 5 weight-loss myths.


Myth #1: Lifting weights is counterintuitive when you're trying to lose weight... because lifting weights 'bulks you up'.

The facts?

The truth of the matter is that utlizing strength-training (in the form of lifting weights or any other high-intensity resistance-training activity) on a regular basis can actually help you maintain or lose weight.

Simply put: These activities build muscle. Muscle burns SIGNIFICANTLY more calories than body fat. This is particularly true even at rest.

Logically, if you increase your lean mass, then you'll increase the number of calories you burn... ergo:

muscle-building activities = fat-loss activities

It would be counterintuitive to exclude weigh-training from your fat-loss program.

All of my clients, even my female clients, weight-train no less than twice per week. On average they train thrice per week.

Those who lose weight the fastest are those who weight-train four times per week.


Myth #2: "Low-fat"/"nonfat" means calorie-free or 'healthy'.

The facts?

Foods labelled "low-fat" or "nonfat" are often lower in calories than an equal-sized portion of their full-fat alternative. On the surface, this is good... right? It can be... but it often isn't.

Many of these foods labelled as 'healthy alternatives' can contain just as many calories as their full-fat alternatives... some may even contain MORE.

Some may contain added sugar, flour (and other thickeners)... or even High-fructose corn syrup.

These additives serve to 'improve' flavor, texture, and mouth-feel, that the removal of fat alters.

High fructose corn syrup in particular, has been noted to be MORE fattening than sugar.

Logically speaking, how can an alternative that has been made MORE fattening be the 'healthier' choice?

My advice?

Judiciously read the Nutrition Facts on foods to find out what the ingredients are, as well as how many calories are in a serving.


Myth #3: Eating red meat is out if you're trying to lose weight.

I received a really annoying (and I must say, unsolicited) message on facebook just last week, which basically said this.

I replied to the young lady...and she proceeded to send me EVEN MORE ANTI-MEAT SPAM!

"Red meat sits in your gut for months!"

Really? Tell that to my 28" waist!

The facts?

Eating lean meats supports fat-loss! Yes, red meat contains fat... but fat is necessary for fat-loss, as well as for the support of optimal hormonal output (which, in turn plays a supporting role in fat-loss).

Red meat also contains nutrients like iron, zinc and, importantly, protein.

Why is protein important?

Diet-induced thermogenesis comes to mind.

Diet induced thermogenesis can be defined as an increase in energy expenditure above that of the basal fasting level (divided by the energy content of the food ingested). Diet-induced thermogenesis

is one of the three components of daily energy expenditure... the other two being: one's basal metabolic rate, and activity-induced thermogenesis.

Diet induced thermogenesis could play a role in the maintenance of weight.

Post-ingestion of protein-rich foods, such as red meat, diet-induced thermogenesis was much higher than that which manifests after carb-dominant, or fat-dominant food were ingested.

High protein foods, such as red meat, also convey higher levels of sateity.

Simply put, you feel more satisfied at the end of you meal.

As gastric emptying is slower for red meat than it is for fish and poultry, there's also the added benefit of feeling fuller longer.

My advice?

Choose cuts of meat that are lower in fat and trim all visible fat. This practice makes it easy to fit red meat into any (non-vegetarian) eating style... whether it be a low-fat diet, or a ketogenic one.



Myth #4: Don’t eat after [X] p.m.

...where 'X' is some random time in the evening.

I have no idea where this myth originated... but I absolutely abhor it.

It's one of those silly things that people practice without questioning... and it's particularly counterintuitive for working people. i.e. People who generally exercise in the evening (after work).

As long as you're awake, fuel is coming from somewhere.

This is what people seem unable to grasp.

It really isn't about WHEN you eat... It is about WHAT you eat.

In Europe, it's quite normal to eat after 10 p.m.

Europeans are (and have been for many decades, if not more) generally less fat than Americans.

How can this be if they're eating after 6 p.m.?

I'll reiterate: It does NOT matter what time of the evening you eat.

It does however matter what and how much you eat.

True, your energy demands are lower as the day progresses (unless you add activities which require high energy expenditure later in the day)... however, 'lower' and 'non-existent' can't be used interchangeably.

Keep portions smaller towards evening, 'cept in the meals where the primary goal is to replenish glycogen stores and facilitate recovery from exercise... i.e. the post-workout meals.

My general rule of thumb is: Consume protein + small amounts of fat + fiber if you're up at night.

An additional piece of advice: Try to avoid snacking in front of the TV at night, as most people tend to overeat while watching television.

I find snacks such as sugar-free jello, cottage cheese (and similarly moderate protein, low-fat, low-sugar products) fit nicely in this time slot.


Myth #5: "As long as I count calories, I can lose fat eating WHATEVER I WANT!"

...Yes, and I'm the king of Persia!

This particular bit of rubbish tends to get thrown around a lot.

"Fat-loss = Calories out > Calories in"

A blatant oversimplification at best.

The facts?

It IS true that, in order to lose weight, you need to use more calories than you eat.

And it IS possible to lose weight eat without changing the types of food you eat, as long as you don't exceed your daily caloric requirements.

However, it doesn't work absolutely and indefinitely like that.

Foods with glucose loads can cause an impaired response to insulin, thereby making it easier for a person to get fat via high carbohydrate consumption.

You are what you eat after all... Ergo, one shouldn't expect to eat like crap (indefinitely) but look spectacular.

It isn't logical.

...and it won't happen.



-Corey Springer
Owner of The NarkSide
Owner of Apollo Fitness Barbados

Nark resurrects the dead(-lift)

Nark resurrects the dead(-lift)
By Corey Springer AKA "Narkissos"

Monday, June 8th 2009: The NarkSide


I've got to warn you guys in advance: This article started out of a pseudo-rant!!

There will be no beating around the bush... or hand-holding of any kind!

Anyway... let's get to it.

Here are my primary assumptions:

1. Your deadlift sucks.

2. Your sucky deadlift both embarasses you and pisses you off at the same time. (as it should)

3. You'd like to fix your sucky, embarassing, and aggravating deadlift.


Here are my secondary assumptions:

1. You train hamstrings and glutes in the conventional manner (i.e. with laying leg curls and squats), yet you find it 'impossible' to make contact with your hamstring and glute muscles.

2. You have the posterior flexibility of an 80-year old. (No offense to any fit 80-year olds out there)


Muscles of the posterior chain (the glutes, hamstrings, calves, and lower back), being out of sight, seem to be those hardest to recruit.

It is also these muscles (yes, even calves) which are of primary importance during the deadlift.

My first attempt at correcting one's inability to recruit them would be to prioritize them.

In other words, to build up your deadlift we're going to step away from it for a bit.


1. Warm-up well.

This may seem like a no-brainer... but most trainees simply don't get it right.

The point of warming up is to:
• Raise core temperature
• Prepare one's target systems for repetitive and extensive use.


This should be done in a manner that utilizes the target musculature and related joints.

Most trainees neglect this however.


I'll go one step further in saying this: Most trainees' warm-ups make no sense... at all!!!

e.g. Joe average has pecs and delts today. He hops on a treadmill and sprints until the sweat is pouring off him. This isn't bad in and of itself. However, it's what he does next that I'd peg an epic failure.

Joe hops off the treadmill and goes straight to the Flat Bench press. He does two warm-up sets... and then 3-5 heavy sets. Pec day has started with a bang. The problem with 'bangs' is, they're usually followed by shooting pain. Horrible pun... I know.

Anyway... the next day, Joe's rotator cuffs are sore. And Joe attributes this to a job well done. No pain, no gain... right? Wrong!!!

The simple of the matter is that Joe's shoulder complex was not ready for the heavy work-load at hand.

Joe failed in his attempted warm-up.

Let's learn from Joe's mistake(s)!!!


Here is my step-by-step posterior chain warm-up:

• 5-10 minutes aerobic work.

I use one of three stations for this exercise: the treadmill (inclined); the stationary bike; the eliptical. I prefer the stationary bike for this. Let me extrapolate as to the 'why' of my choice.

The ankle has the largest range of motion on the treadmill. This is because the foot disengages from the surface of the treadmill during both the plantar flexion and dorsiflexion. However, hip movement is minimal with this piece of apparatus... unless a significant incline is utilized.

The eliptical, on the other side of the spectrum, has a high degree of hip movement... but, the foot pedal being fixed, a low degree of plantar flexion.

The stationary bike represents the best of both worlds for our purpose.

The foot pedal on this piece of apparatus allows free movement through the mediolateral axis.



• Self Myofascial Release (SMR): aka "foam-rolling"

SMR is a somewhat simple technique that can be used to manipulate trigger points. Trigger points are areas of muscle that have become thick, tough and knotted. These areas are painful, or extremely tight, when stretching is attempted. Trigger points can restrict or alter the motion.

These restrictions and alterations can eventually lead to postural and range-of-movement degredation, chronic pain and injury... as well as less efficient motor skill performance. Studies have shown myofascial release to be an effective treatment for myofascial pain syndrome [1][2][3]... thus making SMR a potentially effective preventative measure.


• Lunges... with a twist.

**Most individuals are taught that lunges should be done with one's torso complete upright.

This is all well and good if:

1. One's hip and its flexors (et. al.) have full range of motion (i.e. there are no adhesions [due to previous trauma etc.], or muscular imbalances. Imbalances, for example, can

result in suboptimal opposing forces. These can lead to strain, or the reinjury of previously strained areas.)

2. The individual is fully warm. For the purpose of warming up, particularly where the individual already exhibits imbalances (or the inability to recruit primary musculature), a more appropriate manner of loading would be a torso angled lunge.

A forward lean, with no lumbar rounding, causes the pelvis to rotate forward... thus increasing the stretch (and subsequently, the range-of-motion), as well as glute recruitment and loading.





2. Isolate those puppies!

The conventional deadlift is characterised by a moderate to high level of muscle activity in the hip, knee, and ankle plantar extensors. As a lot of individuals are unable to properly recruit the required musculature, isolation work becomes necessary.

Isolation work helps to reinforce the mind/muscle connection, by teaching an individual what he/she should be feeling when the musculature is contracted.

You would benefit from feet-elevated glute bridges, swiss-ball reverse hyper-extensions, or close-stance kneeling squats. With regard to feet-elevated glute bridges: The elevation of the feet allows you to incorporate hamstring recruitment in addition to your primary objective, which is glute activation.




3. Get your jump on!

To improve my deadlift, I started to do an explosive plometric movement prior to each set to ensure that the target musculature was firing correctly.

Jumping squats fit perfectly here, since the musculature recruited in the deadlift is so similar to that recruited in the squat.

I prefer to jump through an angled plane... i.e. a vertical leap with horizontal movement (preferably to the rear, to prioritize the 'up and back' pushing movement), so I usually utilize a 6" platform set up behind me.

You would benefit from a similar approach... I would suggest instead however to use said exercise to further 'warm-up' the target musculature. (i.e. instead of doing 1-3 reps prior to each set of your main exercises, do 2-5 straight sets to warm up)




4. Go solo with unilateral work

The typical trainee sticks to the standard lifts... because that is what he is taught.

The typical trainee thinks uni-lateral work is 'shaping' work.

But this is far from the truth. (btw: i don't believe in 'shaping exercises'.. but that's another discussion for another day)

When i get the typical trainee in the gym for one day... He normally brags about what he can bench, squat, and over head press.

So... I deconstruct his training... and in the process of doing so, expose the weaknesses.

Most do not have the stability or strength to execute a single-leg deadlift.

Most have huge discrepancies between the weight that they can overhead press on a flat bench (with no back rest) v.s. what they can on the 'standard' bench... and again what they can press over head with dumbbells.

"Duh Nark... that's the way it SHOULD BE!"

I think not.

The above shows that his secondary-support musculature is weak, and/or simply under-utilized.

Most cannot make contact with said musculature.

So my solution?

Prioritize unilateral work...and, in so doing, eliminate secondary weaknesses!

(NB: Unilateral work: Where your target musculature is concerned... that would be walking lunges, single-leg deadlifts, single-leg hyper-extensions.. etc.)



5. Bury the deadlift... resurrect its relative.

Yea... that's right.

Drop the deadlift! Bring in a substitute.

"What should I sub it with" you may ask?

A more glute/hamstring-dominant variant of course: Stiff Leg Deadlifts FTW!

  • With the standard deadlift, characterized by extensive knee-bending, glute and hamstring recruitment is reduced [4]. Conversely, the slight (15-20 degree) knee flexion involved in the stiff-leg deadlift heavily recruits the muscles of the hamstrings and glutes [5][6][7].

Individuals with poor deadlifts tend to make two primary mistakes:

• Initiating the lift with their hips too high... thus pulling with the erectors as opposed to the hamstrings and glutes.

• Initiating the lift with their hips too low... thus turning the lift into a squat, as opposed to a deadlift.

Both of these patterns are habitual where posterior weaknesses exist. Thus, swapping an exercise with reduced hamstring & glute recruitment for one where these muscles are heavily recruited is only logical.




6. Step up to the platform!

Yes.. that's right.

Add a platform to the lift... increasing the Range-of-motion (ROM).

Greater ROM = greater motor unit recruitment.

Don't worry about what's on the bar.

If you compared a 500 lb quarter squat to a 350lb ATG squat... which one do you think recruits more musculature?

Exactly: The 350 lb ATG squat!!!

It isn't rocket science.

Increase the ROM!

NB:

Caution should be paid to the limit of one's posterior flexibility.

Let your back dictate the depth of your ROM.

Additionally, avoiding rounding of the back.

This will require conscious effort on the part of those with posterior weaknesses.

Conscious, but necessary effort.

Most fall in to the pattern of looking down at the bar... thus flexing their neck.

This is inappropriate.

I often tell my clients "Don't look at the bar... It isn't going anywhere."

This is to say, basically, don't fall into the pattern of following the path of the bar with your eyes. Instead, stick your chest out (thus contracting your spinal erectors) and tilt your head slightly upward while you descend.



7. Supra-Isolation!!

Isolation... with a difference!

"Um... what Nark?"

I'm talking about heavy static holds and exaggerated negatives at the end of each glute/ham work-out.

Here's where we turn things a bit.

I can see you just sitting there thinking "What the hell are you babbling about Nark?"

I'll tell you!

Neuroplasticity... aka cortical re-mapping!

Research shows that repetitive action fosters the development of neuromuscular control.

One of the primary reasons people's deadlifts fail, is due to poor muscular recruitment... i.e. the lack of neuromuscular control.

Ask the average gym-goer why his hamstrings lag, and the general reply would be "I can't feel 'em".

Watch the average gym-goer deadlifting, and you'll see a clear and marked posterior weakness in most... that is, providing that you can the few that actually attempt to deadlift that is.

That being said:

better neuromuscular control = more (and more fluid) musculature recruitment = better deadlift form = stronger deadlift.


I find that the best execise for hamstring negative work is the leg curl...either laying or standing (single-leg leg).

Basically, start with 110% (or thereabouts) of your 1-rep max. Have your training partner assist you in curling the weight to the point of max contraction.

At this point, hold the contraction for a 10-count. Next, lower the weight under complete control for a 10-count.



8. Hit those calves!

The deadlift involves some degree of plantar flexion. So, logically, a program geared at improving one's deadlift should prioritize calf-training.

Here, we'll try a calf movement with a difference however. We'll be using the Barbell Calf-raise. There will be no smith machine... no calf-block, no heel drop. Only you, balancing under a barbell.

While machine calf raises are invaluable, they really do less for the development and maintenance of ankle stability. As a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, we'll be fortifying this one!


My final suggestion for now:

9. Stretch.. Stretch... Stretch!

Your hips are your power center, much like your core is said to be.

Stretch your hams during training (between sets), and after your complete your workout.

If you do PWO-cardio... stretch again after this.

Stretch the Adductors during training (between sets), and after your complete your workout.

Stretch the Psoas PWO.


Remember: Your system is a some of parts... A constant interaction of opposing forces.

Think about this when you structure your stretching regime.

If one area is tight, it pulls against another... negating its ability to properly fire.

So... stretch, stretch, stretch!



Putting it all together: A sample Deadlift-building work-out

General warm-up:
• Treadmill: 5 minutes (moderate incline, moderate speed)

• Hyper-extensions: 1 set (10-15 reps)

• Seated Bent-knee Leg-lifts: 1 set (10-15 reps)

• Reverse Hyper-extensions: 1 set (10-15 reps)

• Bodyweight Lunges: 1 set (10 reps each leg)


The workout:

• Hip abduction Machine**: 2 sets: 20 reps

(**NB: This exercise can be substituted with 'clams'.)

• Glute Bridges: 2 sets: 15 reps (or reverse hyper-extentions, or kneeling squats)

• Jump Squats: 2 sets: 10 reps (using 6" platform placed behind you)

• Single-leg hyper-extentions: 2 sets: 10 reps ea. set (Should this exercise be too difficult, swap it for standing single-leg leg-curls)

• Stiff-leg deadlift: 3 sets: 10 reps (standing on 6" platform... lowering as far as you can go without rounding the back)

• Standing Barbell Calf-raise: 3 sets: 15 reps

• Laying leg-curls static holds and negative work: 2 sets: 100% 1RM... executed in this manner:
10-count hold at max contraction... 10-count negative


Directly Post-workout:

• Stretching. I'd suggest a standing single-leg stretch utilizing the swiss ball, positioned directly in front of you.


Good luck all!

-Corey Springer
Owner of The NarkSide
Owner of Apollo Fitness Barbados



References:

1. Hanten, W.P., Olson, S.L., Butts, N.L., Nowicki, A.L. Effectiveness of a home program of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther. Oct;80(10):997-1003. 2000

2. Hanten, W.P. et al. Effects of active head retraction with retraction/extension and occipital release on the pressure pain threshold of cervical and scapular trigger points. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 13(4). 1997

3. Hou CR, Tsai LC, Cheng KF, Chung KC, Hong CZ. Immediate effects of various physical therapeutic modalities on cervical myofascial pain and trigger-point sensitivity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Oct;83(10):1406-14. 2002

4. Tsatsouline, P. Full Range of Motion or Joint's Demolition Project? Parrillo.com, February 1999.

5. Chek, P. Scientific Back Training. La Jolla, CA: Paul Chek Seminars, 1994.

6. Goldenberg, L. Strength Training Q&A. Ironman Magazine. June 2000, Vol. 59, No. 6, pg. 150.

7. Piper, TJ, Waller, MA. Variations of the Deadlift. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 2001, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 66—73.